ABC, 30th April 2015 |
The latest example is the belated apparent acknowledgment that the $630,000 a year the City of Nedlands receives in rates from the Hollywood Private Hospital is crucial to the sustainability of that local government.
But it is still sticking to the myth, aided and abetted by the University of WA itself, that a capital city needs a university campus and a major hospital within its boundaries (why then is it downgrading Royal Perth Hospital?) - without putting forward a shred of evidence to support it. Sounds horribly like the 'economies of scale' myth of sand that was the 'foundation' of local government so-called reform.
There might be a valid argument that a major institution campus should be within one local government, but this doesn't have to be the City of Perth. And certainly it doesn't apply where the institution is split between more than one site, as UWA is. I very much doubt, for example, that anyone would argue that the Curtin University Postgraduate Business School in the City of Perth should come under the Town of Victoria Park, as the main campus does.
In fact, given the spatial separation from the rest of the City of Perth and the fact that UWA and QEII are bounded by residential areas that bear the brunt of access and parking demands generated by them (as Nedlands Mayor, Max Hipkins, rightly points out), the case is surely stronger for those institutions to be part of the local government(s) that have responsibility for the neighbouring areas.
One of the key criteria for local government, according to the Local Government Act, is 'community of interest'. In this case, that requires the institutions and the surrounding communities to be able to work together to manage conflicting as well as shared interests.