…to all those who voted for me in the election. Unfortunately there weren't enough of you to get me back onto Council.
I have (mainly) enjoyed the past fourteen and a half years, although there were times when I wondered why any sane person would do it, and I will miss being involved in the community in that way.
On the other hand, I get my life back. I might even get my front fence rebuilt before it finally collapses.
To all the new Councillors - good luck. I do wonder if you realise what you have let yourselves in for! It is a lot more than two Council meetings a month.
To the new Council as a whole - I hope you continue to be genuinely Vincent, with our unique way of doing things.
To the Town's Administration and staff - thank you for all your support over the years.
I live east of the Administration Centre, so I can't ride off into the sunset. Perhaps it is more fitting, anyway, in terms of getting my life back, to ride off towards the sunrise.
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Don't believe all you read in the newspapers
Given that the Perth Voice has been invited back to the media table in the Town of Vincent Council chamber, I was extremely disappointed to read the inaccurate rendering of the serious debate on the Uniting Care Hostel at 19 Lincoln Street.
At no time did I or any other elected member call for the shelter to be 'axed' (as was reported in the article in the Voice). What I did call for, with unanimous support from my fellow elected members, was to defer a decision on the matter to allow for discussions to take place that might produce a better outcome for all concerned.
The Voice reporter would have had in front of him at the media table the amendment calling for live-in supervision - this was in the name of Cr Maier. I seconded this purely to allow it to be debated. I spoke and voted against it on the basis that we did not have sufficient information to be able to suggest that this alone would resolve any issues.
Far from there being a 'war of words' between myself and Cr Doran Wu, I supported her statements that people have a right to live independently with a sense of dignity. Simply placing people who have nothing in common except their homelessness in a house in a residential area, however, does not do justice to the dignity of either the residents of the hostel or the other residents of the local area.
I think that initiatives such as 55 Central, reported in the adjacent article, have got the balance better. Natarsha Tryl, a volunteer with 55 Central is quoted as saying: "[The homeless] really need to have something to look forward to and to feel part of the community." Well said, Natarsha.
The 55 Central website clearly sets out the philosophy of the association. This includes supporting the individual in "regaining their interdependence and valuable place in the community".
Simply living in a house is not a cure for homelessness, no matter what support is provided; being part of the community, not isolated from it, is essential.
At no time did I or any other elected member call for the shelter to be 'axed' (as was reported in the article in the Voice). What I did call for, with unanimous support from my fellow elected members, was to defer a decision on the matter to allow for discussions to take place that might produce a better outcome for all concerned.
The Voice reporter would have had in front of him at the media table the amendment calling for live-in supervision - this was in the name of Cr Maier. I seconded this purely to allow it to be debated. I spoke and voted against it on the basis that we did not have sufficient information to be able to suggest that this alone would resolve any issues.Far from there being a 'war of words' between myself and Cr Doran Wu, I supported her statements that people have a right to live independently with a sense of dignity. Simply placing people who have nothing in common except their homelessness in a house in a residential area, however, does not do justice to the dignity of either the residents of the hostel or the other residents of the local area.
I think that initiatives such as 55 Central, reported in the adjacent article, have got the balance better. Natarsha Tryl, a volunteer with 55 Central is quoted as saying: "[The homeless] really need to have something to look forward to and to feel part of the community." Well said, Natarsha.
The 55 Central website clearly sets out the philosophy of the association. This includes supporting the individual in "regaining their interdependence and valuable place in the community".
Simply living in a house is not a cure for homelessness, no matter what support is provided; being part of the community, not isolated from it, is essential.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
