This is the personal blog of Ian Ker, who was Councillor for the South Ward of the Town of Vincent from 1995 to 2009. I have been a resident of this area since 1985. This blog was originally conceived as a way of letting residents of Vincent know what I have been doing and sharing thoughts on important issues. I can now use it to sound off about things that concern me.

If you want to contact me, my e-mail is still ian_ker@hotmail.com or post a comment on this blog.

To post a comment on this blog, select the individual post on which you wish to comment, by clicking on the title in the post or in the list to the left of the blog, and scroll down to the 'Post a Comment' box at the foot.

Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Musing: Am I AMUSED or BEMUSED?

I find myself amused by the various claims made by the City of Perth and its Councillors for parts of the Town of Vincent.

Fifteen years ago, the City of Perth couldn't wait to be rid of its residential areas - and so the Towns of Vincent, Victoria Park and Cambridge came into being. The City claimed that the residential areas were being heavily subsidised by business in the CBD and that residents were not part of a Capital City (with Capital letters, no doubt).

Well, if there was subsidisation, it must have been very inefficient, for when Vincent was established we found a tale of sorry neglect of infrastructure and services over a long period of time.

Our major roads were seen simply as traffic sewers, to funnel cars and their drivers (very few passengers) into the city. No consideration was given to the business and residential communities that lined these roads nor of providing any visual respite from bitumen through streetscape improvements - with, to be fair, the solitary exception of Scarborough Beach Road, Mt Hawthorn, although even this was to require much more work - and involvement of the business community - before it really started to pay off.

The rear laneways around the Town were in a shocking state, many of them little better than sandpits. And our footpaths were a disgrace. Vincent Council had to establish long-term programs to improve these.

And before anyone takes me to task because their rear laneway is still like that, let me point out that many of these are still privately owned and the Town can only do work on those that it owns. We are progressively buying these laneways - but it takes time.

Our major parks were tired and run down. When I moved to Vincent Street in 1985, the general reaction of friends and colleagues was "why would you want to live there" - Hyde Park was best known for anti-social behaviour rather than being the family place and 'arcadian jewel' that it now is. Robertson Park was no better.

Sporting facilities in the Town were deteriorating. Perth Oval and Leederville Oval were poorly maintained as playing areas and the grandstands desperately need refurbishment. Compare that to today - Members Equity Stadium is the premier rectangular stadium in WA and Leederville Oval (Medibank Stadium) is the WA Football Centre of Excellence and hosts two WAFL teams that have won seven of the past nine premierships.

Other sports have benefited through redevelopment of the Loftus Recreation Centre to include the State Gymnastics Centre (replacing the decrepit Len Fletcher Pavilion that was literally starting to fall down.

So why do City of Perth Councillors want to take back parts of Vincent? Well, putting aside the fact that we were granted part of their territory last year (which is in the area they now seem to want from Vincent), part of the reason is probably pure jealousy of the extent to which Vincent has been able to partner with others and leverage funding to achieve worthwhile community outcomes. Now that we have done so much in this way, the City wants to take it back - to gain the glory without having to do the hard yards along the way.

I suspect they also have more than half an eye on the value of land in Leederville that will bring the private sector into partnership in the exciting redevelopment there - and make Leederville a real competitor to large parts of the CBD. With the railway from Mandurah to Clarkson running through Leederville and all three freeways providing access by car, Leederville is now the most accessible place in the Perth Region - with the possible exception of the core of Perth itself.

I am amused - yes - I am also bemused, that they have so little knowledge of the past that they seek to repeat its mistakes.

6 comments:

  1. I'm happy with some of the work that the Town of Vincent has done... I think the development of William St between Brisbane and Newcastle has been well-handled (although it could do with more street lights).

    However, the Council's attitude to small bars and licensed premises in general has me wishing that the City of Perth is successful in its bid to take over some territory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your interest Matt.

    Not sure that City of Perth does better than Vincent with licensed premises - Northbridge is hardly a good advertisement for CoP. Vincent has a very good relationship with both police and hoteliers through the Vincent Accord and has introduced effective control of pub-crawl buses.

    With small bars, they have to be taken on a case by case basis, as the proposed locations are not always appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ian,
    Your response is indicative of the general attitude with which I'm unhappy.

    Small bars have very little to do with pub-crawl buses, police and beer-barn hoteliers.

    The Town seems to be of the view that a small number of large venues congregated in a small area (eg. the south end of Oxford St) is sufficient to satisfy everyone's drinking needs.

    I remember reading some council minutes in which councillors were worried that TAFE students would be 'lured' to a small bar over the road. The bar was to be targeting over-30s, and would be focused on French wine and food. The idea that it would 'lure' TAFE students was utterly preposterous, yet the council always seems to err against granting small bar licenses.

    Instead we're burdened with a number of large beer barns and a young population that flees to Melbourne.

    (Incidentally I am not a small bar owner and do not work in the hospitality industry. I am just a Vincent resident in his mid-20s who is dissatisfied with the lack of diversity in the Town).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Incidentally, I was pleased to read that the State liquor licensing minister thinks that more small bars is part of the solution to the drinking culture problem: http://www.abc.net.au/stateline/wa/content/2006/s2611268.htm

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ian,
    I've done some thinking about this, and I hope that my comments don't come off as too combative or needlessly argumentative.

    I do understand that the Council must balance the interests of would-be bar owners and would-be drinkers with other considerations.

    However, I have been extremely frustrated with some of the grounds on which the council has rejected previous applications (eg. my TAFE example for a small bar application on Oxford St).

    I take an interest in these matters because I saw the small bar license as an opportunity for Perth to generate a more diverse, interesting nightlife and cultural life, and to stem the flow of young people to Melbourne. I am very worried that councils (not just Vincent) do not take into account the interests of the community at large when considering these applications, and give too much weight to the small number of NIMBY type objections inevitably lodged with the council.

    Again, I have no direct personal interest in this matter other than as a young person (26) who lives in the Town (the South Ward, I believe) and is sick of his friends moving to Melbourne for lack of things to do in Perth.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wish you would respond to my comments regarding small bars, Ian.

    ReplyDelete